Pilot study of a postal dosimetric audit for radiotherapy in reference conditions

Authors

  • Maria Carmen Pujades-Claumarchirant Centro Nacional de Dosimetría. Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-1924
  • Cristian Candela-Juan Centro Nacional de Dosimetría. Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria.
  • Laura Oliver-Cañamás Centro Nacional de Dosimetría. Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria.
  • Ángela Soriano-Cruz Centro Nacional de Dosimetría. Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria.
  • Juan José Rovira-Escutia Centro Nacional de Dosimetría. Instituto Nacional de Gestión Sanitaria.
  • Facundo Ballester-Pallarés Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear - IRIMED. Universidad de Valencia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37004/sefm/2022.23.1.002

Keywords:

postal audit, dosimetry, quality assurance, OSL, radiotherapy

Abstract

In 2019 a pilot study for postal dosimetry audits in radiotherapy centers was performed by the “Centro Nacional de Dosimetría”. The audit consisted in a verification of the calibration of megavoltage photon beams in reference conditions, for which optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters placed in a water phantom were used. Forty-eight radiation beams were audited, with energies: 6, 10 and 15 MV with flattening filter and 6 and 10 MV flattening filter free (FFF). A difference between the declared absorbed dose and the measured dose below 5% was considered acceptable.

The mean difference between the declared and measured doses was 0.8%, ranging from −0.9% to +1.9%. The uncertainty in the dose measurement was 1.6% (k = 1). No results above the acceptance limit were observed.

From this study it is concluded that the proposed method to audit radiotherapy photon beams is viable and the results obtained for the different audited centers are below the acceptance limit. The uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose is similar to that of other organizations that offer this service.

References

Organismo Internacional de la Energía Atómica. IAEA TECDOC No. 1151 Aspectos físicos de la garantía de calidad en radioterapia: Protocolo de control de calidad. Viena, 2000. ISSN 1011-4289.

Belletti S, Dutreix A, Garavaglia G, Gfirtner H, Haywood J, Jessen KA, et al. Quality assurance in radiotherapy: the importance of medical physics staffing levels. Recommendations from an ESTRO/EFOMP joint task group. Radiother Oncol. 1996;41(1):89-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(96)91799-5

Kouloulias VE. Quality assurance in radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 200;39(4):415-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00461-6

EURATOM. DIRECTIVA 2013/59/EURATOM del consejo de 5 de diciembre de 2013 por la que se establecen normas de seguridad básicas para la protección contra los peligros derivados de la exposición a radiaciones ionizantes, y se derogan las Directivas 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom y 2003/122/Euratom. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. 2013.

Organismo Internacional de la Energía Atómica. Quality Assurance Team for Radiation Oncology (QUATRO). Comprehensive Audits of Radiotherapy Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement. Viena, 2007. ISBN 92–0–103707–4.

Kry SF, Peterson CB, Howell RM, Izewska J, Lye J, Clark CH, et al. Remote beam output audits: A global assessment of results out of tolerance. Phys and Im Rad Oncol. 2018;7:39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.08.005

Izewska J, Bokulic T, Kazantsev P, Wesolowska P, van der Merwe D. 50 Years of the IAEA/WHO postal dose audit programme for radiotherapy: what can we learn from 13756 results? Acta Oncologica. 2020;59:459-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1723162

Organismo Internacional de la Energía Atómica. Quality Assurance Team for Radiation Oncology (QUATRO) IAEA-TECDOC-1543. On-site Visits to Radiotherapy Centres: Medical Physics Procedures. Viena, 2007. ISBN 92–0–102607–2.

Alvarez P, Kry SF, Stingo F, Followill D. TLD and OSLD dosimetry systems for remote audits of radiotherapy external beam calibration. Radiat Meas. 2017;106:412-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.01.005

Kry SF, Alvarez P, Cygler JE, DeWerd LA, Howell RM, Meeks S. AAPM TG 191: Clinical use of luminescent dosimeters: TLDs and OSLDs. Med Phys. 2019;47:19-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13839

Wesolowska PE, Cole A, Santos T, Bokulic T, Kazantsev P, Izewska J. Characterization of three solid state dosimetry systems for use in high energy photon dosimetry audits in radiotherapy. Rad Meas. 2017;106:556-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.04.017

Izewska J, Andreo P. The IAEA/WHO TLD postal programme for radiotherapy hospitals. Radiot and Oncol. 2000;54:65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00164-4

Derreumaux S, Chavaudra J, Bridier A, Rossetti V, Dutreix A. A European quality assurance network for radiotherapy: dose measurement procedure. Phys Med Biol. 1995;40(7):1191-208. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/40/7/004

Ferreira IH, Dutreix A, Bridierc A, Chavaudrac J, Svensson H. The ESTRO-QUALity assurance network (EQUAL). Radiot and Oncol. 2000;55:273-84. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2000.901541

Okamoto H, Minemura T, Nakamura M, Mizuno H, Tohyama N, Nishio T, et al. Establishment of postal audit system in intensity-modulated radiotherapy by radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters and a radiochromic film. Phys Med. 2018;48:119-126. https://10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.03.013

Angelis C, De Coste V, Fattibene P, Onori S, Petetti E. Use of alanine for dosimetry intercomparisons among Italian radiotherapy centers. App Rad Isot. 2005;62:261-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.08.019

Izewska J, Hultqvist M, Bera P. Analysis of uncertainties in the IAEA/WHO TLD postal dose audit system. Rad Meas. 2008;43:959-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.01.011

Izewska J, Georg D, Bera P, Thwaites D, Arib M, Saravi M, et al. A methodology for TLD postal dosimetry audit of high-energy radiotherapy photon beams in non-reference conditions. Radiot and Oncol. 2007;84:67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.06.006

Wesolowska P, Georg D, Lechner W, Kazantsev P, Bokulic T, Carlsson A, et al. Testing the methodology for a dosimetric end-to-end audit of IMRT/VMAT: results of IAEA multicentre and national studies. Acta Oncol. 2019;58(12):1731-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1648859

Lechner W, Wesolowska P, Azangwe G, Arib M, Alves VGL, Suming L, et al. A multinational audit of small field output factors calculated by treatment planning systems used in radiotherapy. Phys and Im Rad Oncol. 2018; 5:58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2018.02.005

Ibbott GS,Thwaites DI. Audits for advanced treatment dosimetry. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2015;573:012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/573/1/012002

Izewska J, Lechner W, Wesolowska P. Global availability of dosimetry audits in radiotherapy: The IAEA dosimetry audit networks database. Phys and Im Rad Oncol. 2018;5:1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2017.12.002

Downloads

Published

2022-05-15

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

How to Cite

Pilot study of a postal dosimetric audit for radiotherapy in reference conditions. (2022). Revista De Física Médica, 23(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.37004/sefm/2022.23.1.002

Similar Articles

61-70 of 97

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.